Mistakes Men Make

Mistakes Men Make

This is about mistakes men make in their interactions with women.

I’ve been in 2 long term relationships with women.

I was married for 26 years 20 of which i think were good years.

My 2nd relationship is on going and has been successful. We’ve been living happily together for 12 years. We’ve had our ups & downs but it’s got better as the years have gone on as our understanding of each other has improved.

This is what I’ve learnt so take it or leave it.

  1. Arguing with a women- never use logic with a woman because they don’t understand logic or truth it only exasperates & confuses them making them even more emotional . In fact my number one rule never argue with a woman period. Arguing with a woman is a waste of time.
  2. The best way to win an argument when a woman insists on having an argument is to hug her or compliment her or use evasive techniques to change the topic by changing the focus of the conversation to a triviality.. Arguing back with logic or using emotional tactics like raising your voice or swearing is counterproductive and a womans tactic. Men need to assess what is going on behind a woman’s insistence on arguing. He needs to ask himself “why is she arguing?” . The answer will have something to do with an unfulfilled need and nothing to do with the point of the argument. In my experience most of the time it’s an unfulfilled emotional need that will fix her.
  3. Never say “yes” especially when you’re concentrating on something and she is in your ear. She will remember and you won’t and it will be used against you in her law court.
  4. Treating a woman as an equal- i’ve found this to be a big mistake. Women are not men. They don’t think or act like men they don’t appreciate being treated like a man. They want to be treated like a woman no matter what they say. You treat a woman like you would treat a child with special needs. They are very emotional creatures.
  5. Never think she’s yours . Doesn’t matter if you’re married or not, they are never yours. They’re only with you while their needs are met or if they can’t get anything better.
  6. Never rely on a woman. Women are not trustworthy. It’s not personal it’s just not in their nature. They’re like little children so never believe what a woman tells you, always get verification. It’s ok telling them you don’t believe them. Women make up stories that they have convinced themselves are real.
  7. Never take what a woman says literally always look for the emotional reasons behind what they’re saying. A man needs to ask himself “why is she saying this? What is she really saying? What emotional need is she indicating has not been met?”. Don’t expect truth from women it’s rare.
  8. Don’t ask a woman to do anything it’s a waste of time. If she does it it won’t be done properly anyway. If you want something done do it yourself. Women are only interested in what they need.
  9. Don’t fall into the trap of believing women care about you, they don’t they only care whether you will be there to take out the garbage or take them on a holiday. Nothing personal it’s just the way they are.
  10. Women don’t care about your emotional or sexual needs they don’t understand or perceive anyone’s needs but their own. They will fulfill your needs if they believe it serves their best interests. Nothing personal.
  11. Women get offended by logical argument they see it as demeaning them because they can’t understand it.
  12. Women in general are amoral, that is morals or principles are not part for the most part of their thinking process. They will say it is because of how they want others to see them. But when you discover why they do things or why they take a particular position in a contentious issue you’ll discover it never has anything to do with morals or principles but everything to do with obtaining what they think they want or need. This is not personal it’s just the way they are made.
  13. Never expect an apology from a woman. Woman cannot admit fault because that effects their ego and humbles them. Woman never admit fault. Don’t think or insist on an apology. If they are wrong they’re wrong . You don’t need an apology just register the fact and move on. If your woman apologises it’s rare and valuable, reward that. I respect a woman who is humble enough to admit without qualification that she is wrong but in my experience this is very rare.
  14. Women on the whole won’t admit to not understanding concepts or the use of hypotheticals in proving logical argument or logical laws and reasoning techniques they’ll tell you they do then go on arguing illogically ignoring those very concepts they claim to understand. Again don’t argue with a woman. Simply state your position & walk away.
  15. Women don’t mean what they say or say what they mean. It’s an interpretation game where attention must be paid to their emotional clues especially their body language, the pitch of their voice and how they act. Women say more by their actions than their words.
  16. Women don’t love you , they love what you can do for them. Women won’t miss you but they will miss what you did & could do for them.
  17. Women use emotional blackmail and emotive methods to get what they think they need. They know they do this. Men must call it for what it is, “thats emotional blackmail “. It’s been my experience when you do this women blush a sure sign you’ve uncovered their technique and will back off. But they won’t apologise because for them it’s a skill. You recognize it when they use words like ”you said you loved me ….”.
  18. When in discussions with women on contentious issues like abortion women will attack you personally rather than the issues involved. Their aim is to draw you into becoming emotional like them because they can’t argue logically. Recognize they have resorted to a personal attack because they have no logical argument and simply walk away, it’s a waste of time arguing with women.
  19. Women will often ly or embellish a statement without realizing they are lying for them it’s just a way of getting what they want. They see it as a skill they don’t see anything wrong with this.
  20. In a lot of ways women are like mercenaries. It’s not personal but their needs are paramount, they use everything in their bag of tricks to get a man to fulfill their needs. It’s in their DNA to build a nest for their children. One of their best weapons is the love word. They will use this a lot especially early on in the relationship as a form of entrapment. They are very keen to hear you say it as they then have leverage to manipulate & control you.
  21. Men are seduced by women’s beauty and their natural desire to breed. They end up having their life blood sucked out of them losing all love of life then die inside a slow agonising death of spirit before eventually their body and mind succumb. Especially if a man marries young and unprepared. Some women are vampires. Normally the vampires are self entitled princesses avoid this trap.
  22. A good woman is a contributor, honest, hard working, humble, loving and affectionate with a great sense of humour. Look for someone who is ready to apologize, who is fun to be with especially in the great outdoors, who genuinely loves children (you’ll be surprised how few women actually love children) and love animals especially dogs. A woman who can lift a man’s soul when the whole world is against him is a treasure worth finding and holding onto. These are a rare breed & hard to find most today are black widow spiders ready to suck the life blood of any man that approaches. Very easy to identify. Normally stunningly beautiful to look at, proud and often popular. They inwardly despise men and are normally rapid feminists . You can hear whats inside when they speak. They often talk bad about someone often their own so called girl friends.

 

Anyway i think that pretty much covers what I’ve learnt. Hope it helps.

 

If women are upset or emotional about what i’ve written please don’t take it personally. It’s not meant to offend. This is about mistakes men make when interacting with women.

Society Collapse & Feminism

Societal Collapse can be mapped to feminism and the feminist movements achievements

The following steps map societies collapse alongside the rise of feminism.

  1. Men abuse their position of power over women creating discontent amongst women who have no avenue to engage themselves in creative pursuits or to own property 
  2. Women rightfully pursue their right to own property & engage in creative pursuits in society under their own identity 
  3. Original feminist movement is identified by the illuminati & other secret societies as a perfect vehicle to ferment societal change in order to implement their world domination agendas.
  4. Feminist movement is hijacked via funding provisions through Rockefeller foundation & others to push for voting privileges.
  5. Woman allowed to vote- Tipping society towards socialism ensuring the implementation of a leftist agenda.
  6. Society is brainwashed into believing Women can only be successful and fulfilled by competing with men in the workforce. Stay at home mums are demeaned & viewed as unsuccessful.
  7. Woman enter work force – Weakening family cohesion 
  8. Women obtaining contraception particularly the contraceptive pill – Giving women power over their fertility. Effectively ensuring fall in population & selective breeding. Removing the incentive for the majority of men to marry & therefore sacrifice themselves to lifelong labour to provide for a family.
  9. Woman become idolised in advertising, pornography and beauty contests.
  10. Society agrees to become an accessory to murdering babies to support female sexual liberation or license by making abortion legal & making abortion a woman’s right. Effectively elevating woman above men by supporting & giving them power to kill the male & female babies that result from any sexual interactions. At this point men became second class people. Women were given the power over sex . At this juncture it became impossible for society to recover from its moral collapse.
  11. Society is brainwashed into believing women are equal to men rather than complimentary. 
  12. Women take over positions of management thus commanding men. Turning society upside down. Denying God’s command that women be under obedience to men. This goes against the natural order. This step is a consequence of the previous step.
  13. Women enter politics and religion. Steering society towards a female bias . Ensuring preferences for females and men who choose to become more feminine. This ensured the rise of the LGBTQP (lesbian gay by transgender queer pedophiles) in society, & ensuring society supports these adherents with laws to force everyone to comply be complicit in their degenerate behaviour.
  14. Society first encourage then Forces male sterilization ( male pill, trans types) after first demonizing all forms of masculinity. Discourage & discriminate against males , male aggression, male power, males in the workforce. Quotas to ensure female dominance. Advertising to demonize masculinity.
  15. Logic & truth is demonized as masculine and trivialized as trivial pursuits are prioritized being more feminine.
  16. Men are idolised by women who begin to realise their mistakes but it’s too late to reverse the damage.
  17. Force men to obey women. Encourage men to provide sperm . Society provides designer babies. Babies, children become commodities to be bought & sold. People lose all their rights in exchange for empty promises of safety , security, food & shelter. All those things men once provided women will be handed over to government.  
  18. Everyone becomes totally enslaved. No one can trust anyone. The majority live alone. The economy collapses. Infrastructure decays. Law of the jungle & survival of the fittest takes over. Woman end up worst off because men abandon them. 
  19. Society reboots.
  20. Men regain control 
  21. Woman realize it’s in their best interests to support & obey a man & let men build, & run society.

I think society is currently engaged in the final stages.

The cost to society of female so called equality & sexual liberation is it’s moral integrity. Without moral integrity there can be no trust. Without moral integrity society must collapse it’s inevitable, a logical certainty. Society ends up fu*ked couldn’t resist this pun 😎😎

Responsible Charity

Responsible Charity

Reasons Charity Has Failed in Uganda

Charities have failed in Uganda because those receiving money are not held accountable for how the money is spent and because the money was given without any planning on how it should be spent!!!!!

The blog at the link below explains in detail why charities have failed in Uganda in the past and should be read by those in Uganda wanting support and those interested in helping Ugandan’s achieve self reliance.

It’s very important charity providers don’t give to dishonest people who are likely to abuse or use those in their care.

https://gabazira.com/2015/01/14/effective-poverty-eradication-in-luuka-uganda-is-the-deve-preneur-model-the-answer/amp/

Good Objectives

  1. Help maintain survival
  2. Provide a means to end the need for charity by setting up self sustaining enterprises.

Charity that perpetuates poverty by inculcating patterns of reliance behaviour rather than independence & self reliance is not responsible charity but results in enslaving those who perceive themselves in need of help.

Sometimes the more charitable action is to educate and awaken people to possibilities rather than simply give financial aid which can engender laziness and dependence.

Necessity is the mother of invention. There were no handouts for the early settlers of Australia, their necessity created their self reliance. Africa is wealthy in resources, sunshine, water, pure air, natural fauna & flora, and minerals. The question should be asked why do the African people live in poverty. They must be compelled to cooperate with each other and coordinate resources to break the chains that hold them in poverty.

Having a plan to achieve self reliance and sticking to that plan is the only way to avoid the “hand out poverty trap”.

Forming A Trust Relationship

Applicants seeking charity cannot expect providers to trust them without making reasonable efforts at presenting proof of their honesty, reliability and integrity.

Those seeking charity from strangers need to realize they have a duty to provide to the best of their ability as much information as they can to answer the following questions in order to help prove their credibility:-

  1. Who they are. E.g. Provide some form of photo identification
  2. Exactly where they are. E.g a google map with a location marked on it.
  3. Why they think they should be supported.
  4. Why they can’t get support from the local existing charitable organizations e.g provide correspondence between themselves and local institutions or why they can’t or won’t make an effort to obtain local support.
  5. What they are currently doing to support themselves and the orphans they claim are in their care. e.g. providing proof such as payslips showing wages and/or bank statement.
  6. What their current situation is e.g. Their current weekly monthly income, numbers of those in their care numbers of boys girls their ages and state of health.
  7. What their needs are.
  8. How they intend to spend the charity provided e.g. Food, clothing, shelter, medical assistance, education
  9. Their plans for becoming self reliant.
  10. Any attempts they have made to obtain accreditation e.g. Applications to become accredited with their government. Or the reasons why they haven’t or won’t apply for accreditation. Attempting accreditation & proof thereof will increase trust.
  11. Why they decided to look after orphans rather then putting them in the care of existing accredited charitable organizations like Child Link Foundation https://childlinkfound.org.
  12. Proof that those in their care are not being used as charitable bait.
  13. Why the decision was made to provide for those in their care when it’s claimed that personal resources are so limited.
  14. Independent Referees – Written References from people with community standing that confirm the claimants good character, trustworthiness and that confirm the truthfulness of claims made.

The more evidence applicants can provide that help answer these questions the more chance they have in engendering trust.

Prevarication and efforts to deflect doubts will only go towards proving that the applicant/s are untrustworthy.

People are prudent not to trust statements made without proof.

Referees

Applicants should be prepared to make an effort to obtain written references from people with good standing who are prepared to sign a document confirming their statements as being the truth the whole truth & nothing but the truth.

Maintaining Trust

Money given as a donation carries with it expectations and implied conditions that the money will be spent as promised or expected.

Once applicants have a supporter who has provided financial support those who received the charity have an obligation to:-

  1. Keep the supporters identity and donation private i.e. Secret.
  2. Provide proof of where the donations are being spent. E.g receipts of purchases.

The providers have an obligation to do their best to hold their beneficiary accountable by insisting on proof their donations are being used responsibly.

Funding Methods

1 GOFUNDME CAMPAIGNS

  1. Gofundme campaigns are expensive to run, complex to setup and often require donators to trust the creator of the fund (the trustee) as well as the beneficiary (the donatee or recipient of the funds). The trustee has to transfer collected funds to the recipient using a money sending service which costs more money. Gofundme campaigns involve setting up a stripe account (similar to automated paypal account) which is a holding account before the funds move manually or automatically into the trustees bank account, so that money can be refunded if the donator changes their mind within the legally required 72 hour cooling off period.
  2. Gofundme, stripe, money sending service & currency conversion all come out of the collected funds which means the recipient or beneficiary receives less.
  3. The trustee is responsible for maintaining the Gofundme setup which is time consuming and can be stressful they are also responsible for record keeping to ensure if an audit is requested that all funds can be easily accounted for so people can have trust in the process and they must ensure transparency by ensuring people who contribute can see the money trail to resolve any possible doubts.
  4. The advantage of using Gofundme is it enables donators to donate using their credit and visa enabled direct debit cards.
  5. One of the major disadvantages with the GoFundme setup is the disconnect between the total donated displayed on the Gofundme website and the actual amount available in the underlying stripe account and the amount transferred to the recipient. The different amounts often creates confusion and mistrust.

2 PAYPAL METHOD

  1. The recipient (people seeking charity) sets up on the internet a paypal account and donators send money via paypal to the recipient using the paypal email handle setup by the recipient.
  2. This is very easy for donators to use to send money and they automatically receive receipts.
  3. It is easy for recipients to advertise with a paypal link and their email address as their paypal account handle or identification.
  4. The trustee is paypal.
  5. There is no maintenance process.
  6. The disadvantage is currency exchange costs involved for the donators which can be a large percentage of the funds.
  7. Another disadvantage is the recipient needs a bank account, a home address and must go through the process of linking their bank account with their paypal account which can be complex for people not familiar with the internet and technology.
  8. The recipient must provide the records to show where the money is being spent to maintain donators trust.

3 USING A MONEY TRANSFER SERVICE

  1. Simplest method for recipients.
  2. Using services like WorldRemit or Western Union cost a tiny amount compared to the transfer currency exchange rates incurred in a normal bank to bank transfer.
  3. The recipient doesn’t need a bank account to receive the funds.
  4. The disadvantage is that the donor must use the money transfer service so only determined donators will donate.
  5. The recipient should keep receipts & provide evidence to show that the donated money was spent in accordance with the agreed charity to maintain the trust relationship if they wish to receive further support. They should also supply plans for their ideas for future expansion & how they hope to support themselves in the future. This is so donators can see that the beneficiary (people receiving the donations) are using part of the funds to become self reliant so that eventually they will not need support. If this is not done charity can become a poverty trap.
  6. To set this up the provider will require the recipients photo ID, their address and their mobile phone or email address so the recipient can receive the donation identification number that will enable them to get the money sent.
  7. If the recipient has a bank account and it’s agreed to deposit money there the provider will need the bank account number and banks identification swift code number which is found on the internet.

Responsibilities of Providers

  1. Should insist the beneficiary provides proof of their good faith as described above.
  2. Amount To Donate – It’s a good idea to donate small donations of say $10 or $20. Donating large amounts can put the beneficiary in danger of being robbed, or of being tempted to spend the money on inappropriate things that were not expected. Large amounts tend to breed dishonesty.
  3. At the first suspicion of impropriety and dishonesty you should cease your donations.
  4. Insist on proof of where the donations are being spent.
  5. Insist on a plan for financial independence otherwise your donating will enslave the beneficiary rather than help them towards self sufficiency.

Reasons Why Poverty Exists in Luuka 48 km NE Of Jinja

https://gabazira.com/2015/01/14/effective-poverty-eradication-in-luuka-uganda-is-the-deve-preneur-model-the-answer/amp/

Websites

  1. Paypal https://paypal.com
  2. World Remit https://worldremit.com
  3. Gofundme https://gofundme.com
  4. Western Union https://westernunion.com
  5. Child link foundation https://www.facebook.com/Child-Link-Foundation-Uganda-414152298652209/
  6. http://www.childlinkfound.org
  7. Save the children https://savethechildren.org.au
  8. https://www.somondo.org/events/sustain-micro-enterprise/276/visit-our-microfinance-projects
  9. https://africageographic.com/blog/12-edible-indigenous-south-african-plants/
  10. http://www.sustainme.co.za/eco-living.html
  11. http://www.offgridquest.com/green/how-to-start-a-farm-with-no-money
  12. Ugandan Charities http://www.aboutuganda.com/uganda/ngos/uganda-ngos

Author

Simon Shields http://ozff.org/contact

 

SEDITION

sedition

sɪˈdɪʃ(ə)n/
noun
noun: sedition; plural noun: seditions
  1. conduct or speech inciting people to rebel against the authority of a state or monarch.
    synonyms: incitement (to riot/rebellion), agitation, rabble-rousing, fomentation (of discontent), troublemaking, provocation, inflaming;

    rebellion, revolt, insurrection, rioting, mutiny, insurgence, insurgency, subversion, civil disorder, insubordination, disobedience, resistance, defiance
    “advocating multiparty democracy is considered sedition”

Effectively defunct for nearly half a century, sedition laws returned to public notice in 2005 when changes were included in an Anti-terrorism Bill announced by Prime Minister Howard prior to a “counter-terrorism summit” of the Council of Australian Governments on 27 September. The Bill was introduced on 3 November and passed into law on 6 December 2005 after government amendments adding some protection for the reporting of news and matters of public interest were introduced in response to community pressure. Schedule 7 of the Anti-Terrorism Bill (No. 2) 2005, repealed Sections 24A to 24E of the Crimes Act (1914) and reintroduced them, along with several new classes of offence, in a Division 80—Treason and sedition. Crimes in this division now attract a maximum penalty of seven years’ imprisonment.

https://www.legislation.gov.au/Details/C2005A00127

CRIMES ACT 1914 – SECT 24AA

http://www.austlii.edu.au/au/legis/cth/consol_act/ca191482/s24aa.html

The definition of “seditious intention” originally in Section 24A of Crimes Act 1914 has become (as amended): An intention to effect any of the following purposes: (a) to bring the Sovereign into hatred or contempt; (b) to urge disaffection against the following: (i) the Constitution; (ii) the Government of the Commonwealth; (iii) either House of the Parliament; (c) to urge another person to attempt, otherwise than by lawful means, to procure a change to any matter established by law in the Commonwealth; (d) to promote feelings of ill-will or hostility between different groups so as to threaten the peace, order and good government of the Commonwealth.

We do not have free speech in Australia. If you knock the government you can be charged with Sedition and if proven guilty be incarcerated for a maximum of 7 years.

In 1949 a case came before the High Court involving the utterance of what were alleged to be seditious words: Burns v Ransley. Gilbert Burns, a member of the Communist Party of Australia (CPA) said that in any war between Soviet Russia and the West, the CPA would fight on the side of the Soviets. Burns was convicted of uttering seditious words under the Crimes Act 1914. Burns appealed to the High Court but his appeal was dismissed. Burns argued that the Commonwealth did not have Constitutional power to make laws with respect to crime, and could not make political criticism a criminal offence. However, Latham CJ said that section 61 read in conjunction with section 51(xxxix) allows the Commonwealth to make laws to protect itself. His Honour noted that while Parliament does not have the power to enact legislation punishing political criticism, ‘excitement to disaffection against a Government goes beyond political criticism’. The last prosecution was in 1960, when Department of Native Affairs officer Brian Cooper was prosecuted for urging “the natives” of Papua New Guinea to demand independence from Australia. He was convicted, and committed suicide four years later, after losing his appeal.

Most of this information was sourced from

The Freeman Delusion – Free E-Book by Robert Sudy

 

 

COURTS DO NOT ACCEPT COMMERCIAL LIEN PRINCIPLE

The courts do not accept the principle that a commercial lien relies on.

http://ozff.org/freedomfighters/CommerceLawMaxims.html

6. An unrebutted affidavit stands as truth in commerce. See 1 Pet. 1:25; Heb. 6:13- 15. Legal maxim: “He who does not deny, admits.”

This commercial law maxim also referenced here http://fduniversity.wikifoundry.com/page/Commercial+Maxims

Is not accepted in Court.

See

http://www.austlii.edu.au/cgi-bin/sinodisp/au/cases/nsw/NSWSC/2015/201.html?stem=0&synonyms=0&query=%22commercial+lien%22

Master Bowman agreed that the Letters Patent appointing the Governor-General, which for Major-General Michael Jeffery and several of his predecessors were clearly stamped with the Great Seal of Australia, should perhaps have been stamped with the Great Seal of Britain instead. But the success of Mr Fitzgibbon ended at this particular concession. “Essentially it is a matter of procedure and not necessarily of substance – that the wrong seal was used,” Master Bowman found in the judgement. “The claim should be struck out on the basis of hopelessness … and, where appropriate, embarrassment.” Accordingly, the judgment of Master Bowman provides no support whatsoever for the contentions for which it is cited in the so-called affidavit/ commercial lien . Secondly, the repeated proposition that the affidavit, being unrefuted, “stood as law and fact” is equally nonsense.

Unrebutted affidavits do not necessarily conclusively establish the facts deposed to in them.

They are evidence of facts. They do not establish them conclusively. Even less do they establish law. Thirdly, the idea that somehow by serving the so-called commercial lien on the Deputy Commissioner or anyone else those parties become bound by it is equally nonsense. Mere receipt or notice of a document does not mean that the recipient acknowledges, accepts or becomes bound by it. In the course of legal proceedings, parties are served with statements of claim and affidavits on a regular basis. The receipt of those documents does not of itself mean that the party is bound by or party to it, any more than receipt of a letter by an addressee means the party accepts its truth or becomes bound by it. The “affidavit/ commercial lien ” demonstrates no defence whatsoever to the winding-up proceedings. The court orders that: (1) The defendant Glenevan Pty Limited be wound up in insolvency; and (2) Christopher Chamberlain of Chamberlains SBR, Suite 103, Level 1, Wollundry Chambers, Johnston Street, Wagga Wagga in the State of New South Wales be appointed Liquidator. (3) The plaintiff’s costs payable out of the assets of the corporation be fixed in the sum of $5,500 inclusive of GST.

 

Moon is only 70 Miles Wide

The coming solar eclipse over American will prove beyond doubt that the moon is less than or equal to 70 miles wide.

A shadow of an object is the same size or larger than the object. This is an observable irrefutable fact.

The width of the shadow of the moon on the Earth as it blocks the sun’s rays will give an estimate of the moon’s width.

The rays of the sun are parallel they cannot converge as is often depicted in pseudo scientific explanations.

False Claims Motu Proprio of July 11 2013 Released Trust Funds

I’ve read that some people think the Pope Francis Papal Decree Motu Proprio of July 11th 2013 somehow closed down corporations world wide and released trust funds held by the Vatican via Birth Certificate bonds to the public benefitiaries. You can see these types of posts on youtube here You’re Wealthy Beyond Your Wildest Dreams by Harvey Dent posted july 8th 2017 and JULY 07 2017 POPE FRANCIS DESTROYS ALL CORPORATION RELEASING ALL THE TRUST FUNDS TO HUMANITY – By EMPOWR MARKETINGS posted July 7th 2017 . Both these YouTube postings rely on this article Pope Francis makes a law..destroys every Corporation in the world and this article which makes all manner of assumptions Papal Decree of July 11, 2013 .

If you read the Popes letter for yourself without relying on the interpretations put on the various statements you’ll soon come to the same conclusion I have that people are reading things in this that simply aren’t there.

Reading the Papal letter shows it does not close down any corporations. In fact the contents of the letter never mentions closing down anything. Obviously all the Pope is doing is saying that criminals in the Vatican will be subject to the Justice system and will be extradited if they have broken the law according to the existing criminal code existing at Vatican City at the time of the alleged offense and that this also applies to Vatican officials.

Don’t be fooled. Always read the source information. There are many people spruiking false ideas.

It’s interesting that these false claims appeared around July 7th 2017. I’m very aware of numbers and how important numbers are to these mason types.

Victoria Police Violence

Vicpol over reacted at swingers party shooting & traumatising venue staff and patrons even though they had been told the patrons were using fake plastic guns. Vicpol to be sued for damages Melb club may sue after police shooting

i think this violent behaviour is a direct result of Victorian Police being trained in American ways as a counter terrorist military force. It seems obvious to me these thugs are itching to use their new found skills in intimidation and violence and jump at any and every excuse. They arrogantly pretend to be above the law and have total disregard for any damage they inflict on innocent civilians.

This represents a leftist alignment in our politics and the powers that be using the police to cower the public. I think those running Australia’s unlawful government are scared that the people are awakening to the fraud being perpetuated against them.

This militiarization of police is also an American phenomenon and their training has resulted in trigger happy officers. The recent murder of Dr Justine Damond by Somali Muslim Officer in Minnesota is a case in point.

This destroys any confidence and trust people have in police protection and points to severe problems with today’s society.

http://silenceisconsent.net/first-somali-muslim-police-officer-minnesota-murders-blonde-girl-cold-blood-wont-believe-disgusting-reason/