noun: sedition; plural noun: seditions
  1. conduct or speech inciting people to rebel against the authority of a state or monarch.
    synonyms: incitement (to riot/rebellion), agitation, rabble-rousing, fomentation (of discontent), troublemaking, provocation, inflaming;

    rebellion, revolt, insurrection, rioting, mutiny, insurgence, insurgency, subversion, civil disorder, insubordination, disobedience, resistance, defiance
    “advocating multiparty democracy is considered sedition”

Effectively defunct for nearly half a century, sedition laws returned to public notice in 2005 when changes were included in an Anti-terrorism Bill announced by Prime Minister Howard prior to a “counter-terrorism summit” of the Council of Australian Governments on 27 September. The Bill was introduced on 3 November and passed into law on 6 December 2005 after government amendments adding some protection for the reporting of news and matters of public interest were introduced in response to community pressure. Schedule 7 of the Anti-Terrorism Bill (No. 2) 2005, repealed Sections 24A to 24E of the Crimes Act (1914) and reintroduced them, along with several new classes of offence, in a Division 80—Treason and sedition. Crimes in this division now attract a maximum penalty of seven years’ imprisonment.


The definition of “seditious intention” originally in Section 24A of Crimes Act 1914 has become (as amended): An intention to effect any of the following purposes: (a) to bring the Sovereign into hatred or contempt; (b) to urge disaffection against the following: (i) the Constitution; (ii) the Government of the Commonwealth; (iii) either House of the Parliament; (c) to urge another person to attempt, otherwise than by lawful means, to procure a change to any matter established by law in the Commonwealth; (d) to promote feelings of ill-will or hostility between different groups so as to threaten the peace, order and good government of the Commonwealth.

We do not have free speech in Australia. If you knock the government you can be charged with Sedition and if proven guilty be incarcerated for a maximum of 7 years.

In 1949 a case came before the High Court involving the utterance of what were alleged to be seditious words: Burns v Ransley. Gilbert Burns, a member of the Communist Party of Australia (CPA) said that in any war between Soviet Russia and the West, the CPA would fight on the side of the Soviets. Burns was convicted of uttering seditious words under the Crimes Act 1914. Burns appealed to the High Court but his appeal was dismissed. Burns argued that the Commonwealth did not have Constitutional power to make laws with respect to crime, and could not make political criticism a criminal offence. However, Latham CJ said that section 61 read in conjunction with section 51(xxxix) allows the Commonwealth to make laws to protect itself. His Honour noted that while Parliament does not have the power to enact legislation punishing political criticism, ‘excitement to disaffection against a Government goes beyond political criticism’. The last prosecution was in 1960, when Department of Native Affairs officer Brian Cooper was prosecuted for urging “the natives” of Papua New Guinea to demand independence from Australia. He was convicted, and committed suicide four years later, after losing his appeal.

Most of this information was sourced from

The Freeman Delusion – Free E-Book by Robert Sudy




The courts do not accept the principle that a commercial lien relies on.

6. An unrebutted affidavit stands as truth in commerce. See 1 Pet. 1:25; Heb. 6:13- 15. Legal maxim: “He who does not deny, admits.”

This commercial law maxim also referenced here

Is not accepted in Court.


Master Bowman agreed that the Letters Patent appointing the Governor-General, which for Major-General Michael Jeffery and several of his predecessors were clearly stamped with the Great Seal of Australia, should perhaps have been stamped with the Great Seal of Britain instead. But the success of Mr Fitzgibbon ended at this particular concession. “Essentially it is a matter of procedure and not necessarily of substance – that the wrong seal was used,” Master Bowman found in the judgement. “The claim should be struck out on the basis of hopelessness … and, where appropriate, embarrassment.” Accordingly, the judgment of Master Bowman provides no support whatsoever for the contentions for which it is cited in the so-called affidavit/ commercial lien . Secondly, the repeated proposition that the affidavit, being unrefuted, “stood as law and fact” is equally nonsense.

Unrebutted affidavits do not necessarily conclusively establish the facts deposed to in them.

They are evidence of facts. They do not establish them conclusively. Even less do they establish law. Thirdly, the idea that somehow by serving the so-called commercial lien on the Deputy Commissioner or anyone else those parties become bound by it is equally nonsense. Mere receipt or notice of a document does not mean that the recipient acknowledges, accepts or becomes bound by it. In the course of legal proceedings, parties are served with statements of claim and affidavits on a regular basis. The receipt of those documents does not of itself mean that the party is bound by or party to it, any more than receipt of a letter by an addressee means the party accepts its truth or becomes bound by it. The “affidavit/ commercial lien ” demonstrates no defence whatsoever to the winding-up proceedings. The court orders that: (1) The defendant Glenevan Pty Limited be wound up in insolvency; and (2) Christopher Chamberlain of Chamberlains SBR, Suite 103, Level 1, Wollundry Chambers, Johnston Street, Wagga Wagga in the State of New South Wales be appointed Liquidator. (3) The plaintiff’s costs payable out of the assets of the corporation be fixed in the sum of $5,500 inclusive of GST.


Moon is only 70 Miles Wide

The coming solar eclipse over American will prove beyond doubt that the moon is less than or equal to 70 miles wide.

A shadow of an object is the same size or larger than the object. This is an observable irrefutable fact.

The width of the shadow of the moon on the Earth as it blocks the sun’s rays will give an estimate of the moon’s width.

The rays of the sun are parallel they cannot converge as is often depicted in pseudo scientific explanations.

False Claims Motu Proprio of July 11 2013 Released Trust Funds

I’ve read that some people think the Pope Francis Papal Decree Motu Proprio of July 11th 2013 somehow closed down corporations world wide and released trust funds held by the Vatican via Birth Certificate bonds to the public benefitiaries. You can see these types of posts on youtube here You’re Wealthy Beyond Your Wildest Dreams by Harvey Dent posted july 8th 2017 and JULY 07 2017 POPE FRANCIS DESTROYS ALL CORPORATION RELEASING ALL THE TRUST FUNDS TO HUMANITY – By EMPOWR MARKETINGS posted July 7th 2017 . Both these YouTube postings rely on this article Pope Francis makes a law..destroys every Corporation in the world and this article which makes all manner of assumptions Papal Decree of July 11, 2013 .

If you read the Popes letter for yourself without relying on the interpretations put on the various statements you’ll soon come to the same conclusion I have that people are reading things in this that simply aren’t there.

Reading the Papal letter shows it does not close down any corporations. In fact the contents of the letter never mentions closing down anything. Obviously all the Pope is doing is saying that criminals in the Vatican will be subject to the Justice system and will be extradited if they have broken the law according to the existing criminal code existing at Vatican City at the time of the alleged offense and that this also applies to Vatican officials.

Don’t be fooled. Always read the source information. There are many people spruiking false ideas.

It’s interesting that these false claims appeared around July 7th 2017. I’m very aware of numbers and how important numbers are to these mason types.

Victoria Police Violence

Vicpol over reacted at swingers party shooting & traumatising venue staff and patrons even though they had been told the patrons were using fake plastic guns. Vicpol to be sued for damages Melb club may sue after police shooting

i think this violent behaviour is a direct result of Victorian Police being trained in American ways as a counter terrorist military force. It seems obvious to me these thugs are itching to use their new found skills in intimidation and violence and jump at any and every excuse. They arrogantly pretend to be above the law and have total disregard for any damage they inflict on innocent civilians.

This represents a leftist alignment in our politics and the powers that be using the police to cower the public. I think those running Australia’s unlawful government are scared that the people are awakening to the fraud being perpetuated against them.

This militiarization of police is also an American phenomenon and their training has resulted in trigger happy officers. The recent murder of Dr Justine Damond by Somali Muslim Officer in Minnesota is a case in point.

This destroys any confidence and trust people have in police protection and points to severe problems with today’s society.